Why Burnham needs to reform higher education
Ryan Sheppard • UK • 3 minute read
Image: Joshua Hoehne / Unsplash
Ryan Sheppard • UK • 3 minute read
Image: Joshua Hoehne / Unsplash
Concerning data from August shows the graduate job market has collapsed by 45% in the span of a year, with fewer than 10,000 roles available for university graduates. Meanwhile, university acceptance rates increased 3% in 2025, with a record 262,820 students receiving an undergraduate place. This disparity is something Prime Minister Burnham must address as a priority of his education reform, as this crisis of outcomes for young people deepens.
It was encouraging to hear, only a week into his premiership, Burnham expressing the need for Britain to “value the hard hat as much as the graduation cap”. This is a message schools and colleges across the land needed to hear and now must heed, as for too long they have sold university as the be-all and end-all for their students. I remember, from my own experiences, the only careers or options talks we had at school or college centred around university. There were few, if any, sessions put on to discuss alternative pathways. Those who did not go down the now-conventional undergraduate route have been widely successful, having taken that crucial first step into industry. But they only found these opportunities on the basis of their own research, rather than it being a pathway championed by their sixth form or college.
So many young people who felt obliged to go down the university route in the belief it was their best route to decent employment would have been better off on an alternative, high-quality vocational pathway if it had been more readily available. Not because they lack in any way in terms of their academic ability or intellect, far from it, but because they would have learnt more from gaining that vital real-world experience, getting their first exposure to industry. Many would also have been more fulfilled by practical experience than academics, which they are only doing because they have been told they must in order to achieve their ambitions. It is time to end this university bias.
Image: UK College of Agriculture, Food & Environment / Flickr
Of course, this messaging has come from government posturing and targets over a number of decades, starting with Blair’s vision to get 50% of school leavers to university, a target only scrapped by Starmer last year. Though this ambition was a noble one, to aid social mobility and achieve a more meritocratic society, it has not quite worked out as Blair had imagined, with his son Euan conceding that point in recent interviews.
So, what should this new government do? Well, quite simply, it must provide support to ensure high-quality technical and vocational qualifications are readily available to young people to help get them on to the first step of their career ladder.
On this point, we can be encouraged by the announcement that, from September 2028, students from Year 10 onwards will be able to choose a high-quality technical qualification to undertake alongside their core academic subjects (Maths, English, and Science). This decision, though immediately impacting GCSE students further down the education chain, will hopefully improve higher education for future generations, who we can only hope will not have to experience the usual university-bias-induced anxieties many of us faced at the end of our studies. Fewer students will be subscribed to the orthodox university pathway; instead, they will be on a route that is more beneficial to them, as they will be acquiring practical skills and industry experience.
The need for reform comes from the just want that all aspirational young people in the UK have the ability to reach their personal ceiling
But there is still further to go, particularly on the need to expand vocational opportunities, which I hope a similar scheme, potentially as an alternative to either A-Level or university study, Burnham can come up with during his time as Prime Minister. Even if not a new scheme, the government should work with both public and private sectors to expand the number of apprenticeships and degree apprenticeships available to school leavers.
A final point to stress is that no reform to our education system should come at the cost of working-class children getting access to university if that is the desirable path for them. I am not anti-uni, and for many, university is the right pathway. Either because their desired career requires a degree, or it is simply advantageous to have one, or because someone is unsure what they want to do. Many find the right career pathway for them during their time in study. The need for reform comes from the just want that all aspirational young people in the UK have the ability to reach their personal ceiling; that all aspirational young people have available to them a wide range of high-quality pathways, whether that’s success at a desk or in a trade.
That’s all anyone should want for the future generations of our country.
•Published: 03/10/26